There has been some debate about privacy concerns related to Google’s new application, Google Talk. One of the main concerns is the ability to search and share multiple computers with a single account, allowing users to share files between devices. However, the question is whether these concerns are valid.
Recently, I downloaded the new Desktop Search beta and discovered some interesting new features, such as the ability to remove panels from the sidebar and dock them anywhere on your desktop. Additionally, users can manage what is indexed and play games. One of the coolest features is its ability to reach beyond the desktop it is on to do various things, including playing tic-tac-toe with friends or coworkers.
However, the most significant and controversial update is the ability to remotely index and share files using Google servers to temporarily store items. When activating this feature, users give Google the right to store their files for up to 30 days. Some people are concerned about this requirement.
But what’s the big deal? Even if users have to give Google this ability, the data is encrypted, and no one else can access it. Additionally, even if there is a DOJ subpoena requiring access to these files, it is unlikely to stand up in court. All Google activities are linked to a single account, making it difficult to obtain information pertaining to only part of that account.
If users are concerned about their privacy being surrendered to Google in order to use this system, they can opt not to sign up for it. They can still download and use the new Desktop Search with most of its new features but without the file-sharing option. Alternatively, users can purchase a flash drive to transfer files between devices without worrying about government agencies accessing their data.
While I have the new Google Desktop installed, I did not turn on the file-sharing option. I have no need to search my home computer from work or share files between the two devices. If I did, I would use the FTP site I have set up on my home computer or the flash drive.
Instead of worrying about Google infringing on their privacy, users should be concerned about what Google already knows about them through its other services, such as search history and Gmail. Business owners should also be wary of employees easily stealing and transferring data to and from work.
Lastly, users who are afraid of the US government infringing on their privacy should not have a Google account, nor should they use Google Desktop Search or Gmail. In fact, they should not have any internet accounts because everyone is a target for the DOJ. Furthermore, it is more likely that local ISPs will fold and hand over the data more easily than Google will.
Overall, it is up to users to decide if they want to use Google’s file-sharing feature or not. However, it is essential to remember that users have the ability to stop Google from accessing their data by choosing not to use the feature.
